CEO Don Veolte would much prefer an option that did not cost Woodside as much as the ETS - it will cost them because they will only be partially compensated
If it were viable he would much prefer the option that meant no ETS and customers got his product without the extra cost of a ETS
also there is a lot of criticism of the "polluters getting compesation" - so I'm not sure how green Woodside looks with an ETS
definitely much greener image if the public were convinced AGW does not exist
