Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Wind at Parity with New Coal, page-10

First 10 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
thecurious1

23,153 Posts.

8

21/04/17

19:03

Post #: 24202854
Share

Originally posted by sierra ↑

Correct.
I mentioned batteries because although you claim to have an interest in them you forgot about them when you said,

"First, neither wind nor solar runs dependably around the clock, 24/7, as a coal- or gas-fired or nuclear plant normally does. Hence while the 3 cents/kWh solar price may be half that of a coal or gas plant, it must be backed up in one form or another so it is an apple vs. orange comparison"

Factor in batteries and the above is nonsense. You seem to understand that so must have chosen to leave it out.

Expand

Please don't be obtuse. They are not my words. I left nothing out as I quoted directly from your linked article.

If not mentioning batteries makes the article nonsense, why did you link to it?

If you have an issue with batteries not being mentioned, please contact the author Fereidoon Sioshansi c/- RenewEconomy.
Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 13 more messages in this thread...

First 10 Last

SPONSORED BY