wireline logs results still unknown why, page-11

Thats correct, I downloaded last weeks not today.

My views is for what it worth is that the log anlysis is good, they appear to have possible found some producible gas (hopefully wet eg C1 to C5 plus). Which bodes well for Stoke Bay 1.

What of interest to me is how confident ARQ are on the mapping of the depth closure, as they are dealing with only 2D not 3D seismic data. The gas shows might well be hinting that the mapping could be redone to show a much greater closure at these levels, which might then conect to what they are hopping to intersect at Stokes Bay 1. Then it would be really big.

One also has to be happy to see 15% porosity, would certainly flow gas and liquids (subject to permeability).

Some idea on the gas pressure gradient would be good to see, eg are all these gas zones connected or not?

The key now is for the well to penetrate the deeper reservoir target and for them to contain hydrocarbons. hopeful by this time next week we will know.

cheers

PC43

PS Jaylea, if you only knew how much I have riding on ARQ exploration in the CB.

So why don't you go and be a good boy and wash your mouth out with soap!!!

PPS You are now on my ignore list along with Clark Kent