Of course, we should! If the God you refer to by the title Allah...

First 12 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
whereu

26,905 Posts.

3

15/09/21

09:17

Post #: 56071456
Share

Originally posted by MrGordon: ↑

Should we not think that the Preserver of this message would only choose the best of Creation to carry this message with whom ends the succession of prophets as well as the messages?
----------------------
Of course we should! If the God you refer to by the title Allah was unable to preserve his message then he must be weak. If he was unwilling, it would mean he was unloving. Both ideas are preposterous.
(Isaiah 40:8) The green grass dries up, The blossom withers, But the word of our God endures forever.”

Now, in the "Lord's day"[Rev 1:7], the message is being made available as never before.
(Revelation 14:6) And I saw another angel flying in midheaven, and he had everlasting good news to declare to those who dwell on the earth, to every nation and tribe and tongue and people.

We are all to be judged by our response to that message.
(Revelation 14:7) He was saying in a loud voice: “Fear God and give him glory, because the hour of judgment by him has arrived, so worship the One who made the heaven and the earth and the sea and the springs of water.”

Expand

Of course, we should! If the God you refer to by the title Allah was unable to preserve his message then he must be weak. If he was unwilling, it would mean he was unloving. Both ideas are preposterous.
(Isaiah 40:8) The green grass dries up, The blossom withers, But the word of our God endures forever.”

And yet Watchtower has deemed it necessary to change scripture in a substantial manner that changes its meaning. The Quran changed important aspects of the New Testament message, and arguably so has Watchtower's NWT Bible version to the same or greater extent.
3 Upvote

Reply