Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

No quote to substantiate your claim re Howard @Dochico?

First 128 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Hingdog

22,425 Posts.

1375

19/03/24

13:27

Post #: 72959886
Share

Originally posted by Hingdog ↑

"Mr Howard also defended his government’s decision to define marriage as between a man and a woman saying that Australians had not really thought of marriage as otherwise before 2004"

Unless you can provide a quote that says otherwise(I don't sub to the Oz so can't read the full article), the above is what I remember Howard always saying their reason was i.e the law was written when a marriage was only ever thought of as being between a man and a woman so there was no need to state man and woman in the law, so he was clarifying the law to represent it's original intention

Expand

No quote to substantiate your claim re Howard @Dochico?
2 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 18 more messages in this thread...

First 128 Last