There is no direct evidence in the provided search results that...

There is no direct evidence in the provided search results that Meg O’Neill, CEO of Woodside Energy, specifically cited the "Spanish disaster" as a reason for advocating gas as necessary. However, she has frequently emphasized the importance of gas for energy security and transition, often referencing global energy disruptions like those caused by the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Key Points from O’Neill’s Statements:

1. Energy Security Arguments
   O’Neill has argued that gas is critical to avoid energy shocks, citing the Russian-Ukraine war’s impact on global supplies as evidence of the need for diversified and reliable energy sources 3.

2. Transition Fuel Rationale
   She positions gas as a lower-carbon alternative to coal, supporting decarbonization efforts while ensuring affordability during the shift to renewables 39.

3. Criticism of Rapid Phase-Outs
   O’Neill has warned against "extremism" in decarbonization policies, suggesting that abruptly shutting down gas projects risks economic and energy instability 3.

While she hasn’t explicitly mentioned Spain, her broader narrative aligns with industry arguments that gas mitigates volatility—a point often reinforced by European energy crises. For her exact remarks, further context would be needed.