Totally agree,
Purjury, contempt of court, attempting to subvert legal process etec.
Should be required to pay Santos costs.
Probelm is that there is no accountability nor consequences.
The probelm would stop if the had to pay, say, only a fraction of costs.
Totally agree,Purjury, contempt of court, attempting to subvert...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 17,763 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BPH (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $14.60M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | 616338 | 1.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3¢ | 1909385 | 13 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.12pm 04/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BPH (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable