The similarities are striking that’s for sure.
What I don’t quite understand is if the original legislation was seen to have constitutional consequences, then how can an amended bill that is advertised as stopping PEP11 not have the exact same constitutional consequences.
I don’t get it at all
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BPH
- Wooooo Hooooo Go BPH :)$$$$$$
Wooooo Hooooo Go BPH :)$$$$$$, page-18652
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12,872 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BPH (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
2.1¢ |
Change
0.002(10.5%) |
Mkt cap ! $24.09M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
2.0¢ | 2.1¢ | 2.0¢ | $74.36K | 3.717M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 825986 | 2.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
2.1¢ | 2014404 | 13 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 825986 | 0.020 |
8 | 2839451 | 0.019 |
27 | 3755193 | 0.018 |
12 | 1116265 | 0.017 |
3 | 600389 | 0.016 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.021 | 1689536 | 10 |
0.022 | 982954 | 6 |
0.023 | 1405423 | 5 |
0.024 | 1872500 | 5 |
0.025 | 501320 | 5 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
BPH (ASX) Chart |