"IMO BIAS does not matter if you have legal standing in making your decision." source: 73476773
Incorrect. The metaphor of the fruit from the poisonous tree is similar to that scenario.
There are two problems there, 1) the Federal court actually doesn't check the merits of the NOPTA decision anyway, (not their jurisdiction). 2) Using your logic, the same can be said for the defense, if they thought the reasons for rejection were invalid... (why didn't they put that forward as an argument? lol).
"IMO BIAS does not matter if you have legal standing in making...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5,749 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BPH (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.9¢ |
Change
0.001(5.56%) |
Mkt cap ! $21.80M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.9¢ | 1.9¢ | 1.8¢ | $33.48K | 1.769M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | 2805340 | 1.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.9¢ | 1369853 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 24/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BPH (ASX) Chart |