Agreed....
Apprehended bias under the law is either direct bias or what can be 'seen' to be bias.
It wouldn't be that hard to prove that having a boss (Albo) and another boss (King) saying PEP11 will not proceed creates the notion that the party has a bias or can be seen to have a bias when applying their decision making powers to PEP11.
That's why IMO approval is the only option as hard a pill as that will be for them to swallow and they are setting up the political insulation for this to occur....enter Husic.
Agreed....Apprehended bias under the law is either direct bias...
Add BPH (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
2.1¢ |
Change
-0.001(4.55%) |
Mkt cap ! $23.04M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 2.2¢ | 2.2¢ | 2.1¢ | $13.42K | 617.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | 1483329 | 2.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.2¢ | 600774 | 7 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 10.22am 08/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
2.2¢ |
Change
-0.001 ( 4.76 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 2.1¢ | 2.2¢ | 2.1¢ | 282222 | ||
| Last updated 11.02am 08/05/2024 ? | |||||
| BPH (ASX) Chart |