Why would you want to do Breeze's job for him?
Unfortunately the general public don't care about PEP11. Only the shareholders do because we have a vested interest. The BPHOB options holders are getting to a critical point in that they will become worthless in less than 120 days. That is a huge looming issue.
Shareholders should be concerned that nothing seems to be happening from a company level to pressure the decision, why? There is always a lot of conjecture as to why DB isn't doing anything but no-one really knows why. He should be asked!!
Lots of bush lawyers on here, unfortunately half of them can't even get the court that issued the order correct and keep waffling on about a high court decision like we won Mabo. We got a consent order in the administrative appeals section of the Federal court. We can't action anything in court until a decision is made for us to again challenge that decision in that same section of the Federal court. . I think Justadabble has correctly pointed this out so many times he has given up doing so.
If shareholders really want to ramp up action with the government it MUST come from the company itself. They will have the contacts, budget and authority to pursue these actions. The inaction from Breeze is very frustrating.
Shareholders can requisition a general meeting with 5% of the shares. That's about 55 million shares. According to the number of big talkers on this site that should be a shoe in to reach that target. A meeting is called and DB can have these question put to him directly. Shareholders set the agenda and get answers they need and can move a resolution to actually force action. Things like appoint a PR company to get on the front foot and lobby the decision makers much harder. Do the advertising awareness campaign and have the budget to do it properly.
One poster here claims to own 45 million options. That's almost 9% of ALL options on issue. Surely they would support a meeting because one of the agenda items should be what is the plan with the 550 million options?
This would be a MUCH better idea that trying to exert pressure as individual shareholders. The company can pay for its own issues.
The problem of course is if all the spruikers and big talkers don't own anywhere near the shares they claim and then getting to that 5% threshold will be a problem.
peoples time would be better spent coordinating a requisition of a meeting. Breeze won't want to front a meeting where he hasn't set the agenda and companies HATE it when shareholders requisition a meeting so it may force his hand to actually do something or at least communicate with his shareholders on what is happening instead of treating us all like mushrooms.
food for thought.
