This case is not about Approval. It is about getting the JA to make a decision - which I believe should be an Approval.
The judge has to make a decision on whether or not it has been fair to wait this long and how much longer should we wait for a decision. That is why Asset is asking for the judge to order a decision within 45 days.
Maybe the Judge can approve (ie follow the NOPTA recommendation) IF the JA makes another BIASED decision. That I do not know. BUT a Judge is a Judge..... and they do have vast powers.
AND NO.. I dont think Asset is looking for compensation. They would only ask for compensation if the JA decided to REJECT PEP11.
Lets 'wait' and see in Court!!
Wooooo Hooooo Go BPH :)$$$$$$, page-32613
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1,528 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BPH (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.8¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $21.69M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.8¢ | 1.9¢ | 1.8¢ | $50.07K | 2.780M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | 2523880 | 1.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.9¢ | 814640 | 13 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 16/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BPH (ASX) Chart |