Hey Gang,
Here's an extract from the same article I posted a link to above. Says here that the Fed Court found Ms Plibersek was not obliged to consider the climate harm of new coal and gas projects.
So, if Mr Ed has listed one of his concerns about PEP-11 as being due to climate change, then that'll have to be considered invalid, right?
Hey Gang,Here's an extract from the same article I posted a link...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 394 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BPH (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.2¢ |
Change
-0.001(7.69%) |
Mkt cap ! $14.46M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.3¢ | 1.3¢ | 1.2¢ | $16.32K | 1.358M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 599443 | 1.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3¢ | 1512832 | 7 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.00pm 27/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BPH (ASX) Chart |