Share
12,040 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 2967
clock Created with Sketch. 07/05/25
08:26
Share
Originally posted by Justadabble:
↑
You should post your legal advice, or at the minimum the name of the person providing you with such advice, because without an attribution all you have posted is unsubstantiated opinion.exercise of a power for a purpose other than a purpose for which the power isconferred. the decision-maker mustnot be dictated to by politicians or more senior public servants, or by anyone else. A decision-maker must take into account onlyrelevant considerations TheCourt held that every statutory discretionary power has attached to it by the common law arequirement that it be exercised reasonably, having regard to the statutory purpose of thepower. This new notion of “legal unreasonableness” (as it is described in Li at [66]) does not involvethe courts in undertaking a review of the merits of an exercise of discretionary power 2. the decision-maker has failed to give adequate weight to a relevant factor of greatimportance (at [72]); 6. when a decision lacks evident and intelligible justification (at [76]);
Expand
It’s the scope of the Judaical Review under the Asset Vs the Commonwealth of Australia that’s the nail in the coffin for the tenement of Pep11 3X and you know it, you just can’t make up things to make things go away in long term wealth building, it’s simply not how it works tbh.
(20min delay)