word has it, page-26

kermit,

i here your frustration mate!

I would do these sorts of calcs even if A1 was reporting them (coz i'm a geek) but it is frustrating to be forced to assume and also use DFS figures from 3yrs ago! craziness

anyway, the point here is A1 can be a cashcow if they get it together, but the flipside is they could be just another name added to the 'almost got there' list of wannabee gold producers.

I sincerely hope they make it.

on another note - given A1 has stated a few times that they are mining the 300,000t's p.a. expected, why only 1,600ozs for a month? what is the reason for the discrepancy? Simplistically, I think it is either grade or recovery - and recovery is ok... must be grade.

If this supergene area isnt much chop then it's back to Paterson's IMO.