"my stance is for traditional marriage , a union of man and woman for the reason of procreation , the development of a family , offspring , children , the family unit for guidance , support and the carrying on of the family genes , name , history "
but, it was never for that historically -- it was for control --
control of the chattel -- control of the woman -- control of the lineage
procreating went on whether marriage existed or not ------- ask any teenager who has had an accident.
Marriage was for - all the wrong reasons --------------- we just like to dress it up like lipstick on a pig.
It's really about as advanced as slavery in reality.
- Forums
- Breaking News
- Worker fired for supporting 'no'.
"my stance is for traditional marriage , a union of man and...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 68 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online