Worrying..., page-267

"So you are saying FBR making fake video?"

Nope. What do you mean by "fake" anyway?

"...the FBR machine is wildly recognised a whole suite that taking bunch of bricks as input and automatically layer those bricks based on blueprint as output, and that is why FBR no need show rest of the machine in the video for protection of their technology."

Anyone is free to claim and state such things, yes but where is the evidence to back this claim? Definitely not shown in the video. Widely recognised by who? If you make any claim then the onus is on you back it up with evidence.

"Any evidence to back up your assumption?"

Which assumption?

"And I see your another post trying to compare FBR with a very immature machine which sort of layering bricks, if you can't see the difference then there is really no reason for you to buy FBR or even care about it."

I have no reason to buy FBR, you are right. As for caring, FBR piqued my interest because how extemely silly the hadrian X seems to be. So much claim of its potential but barely any evidence to support it. Whether I care or not, well, by your logic there is no reason for you to care.

"it is almost like you can't see the diff between abacus and computer (even the first generation)"

Difference in function or appearance? If we are talking function then logically the computer must be able to perform EVIDENTLY better than the abacus for it to be worthy of consideration. The computer is obviously incomparable to an abacus in terms of function as supported by the evidence. Where is the evidence that hadrian X is capable to do what the company claims?