If you use your full cognitive capacity you might realise that we are all one of the 70% in one way or other.
You merely chose to believe in simplistic explanations for things because you can't wrap your head around physics. Equal and opposite reactions are just one variable in play there, and if they are what you are informing your opinion on, you should be using the last set of actions as a trigger for the physical appearance, not the first set, as the last set would dictate the surface impression.
They drove, they stopped, they got out and kicked up lots of dust again with their legs. You can even see their footprints everywhere. It is a zero atmosphere low gravity environment. The buggy is light enough to be included in payload. Even the images where it DOES display marks are very light.
If you replayed the same thing on earth there would be limited dispersal, the track marks would be much heavier.
How can you seriously try to debunk one supposed breach of common sense with an even bigger one?
70% thinking right there.
- Forums
- Breaking News
- Would You Believe They Put A Man On The Moon
Would You Believe They Put A Man On The Moon, page-388
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 102 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
RCE
RECCE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD
James Graham / Dr Alan Dunton, MD & CEO / Non-Executive Director
James Graham / Dr Alan Dunton
MD & CEO / Non-Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online