Everyone thinks the merger with BHP was great.
in a time when companies want to reduce their exposure to public sentiment on oil and gas and emissions, why would Woodside take on more ageing assets? It was only to get Scarborough so they could get some gas.
everyone knows their ability and history on decommissioning assets so they will be watched even more closely and it will cost them more to decommission BHPs old assets.
Unfortunately their focus It seems at the moment is being an D&I company and not and oil and gas company
Everyone thinks the merger with BHP was great.in a time when...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 601 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add WDS (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$28.21 |
Change
-0.040(0.14%) |
Mkt cap ! $53.56B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $28.53 | $28.57 | $28.21 | $128.2M | 4.533M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 63674 | $28.21 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $28.23 | 18595 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| WDS (ASX) Chart |