wpl think we are over priced, page-37

Just thinking out load guys.
Hard to imagine that only FAR have grounds for a legal challenge to the PE process.
Petrosen must have received the same package of information from COP for them to decide if they would participate in the PE process.
Certainly FAR and Petrosen must have compared notes you would have thought.
The possibility of a Petrosen PE has not been mentioned so can that possibility be discounted ?
Interesting that the previous boss of Petrosen is now the minister of energy for Senegal and that he also has a background in Geology. On that basis the Selanse Govt are well aware of how the protocol of PE process should be handled to accommodate accountability and fair play.
None of the partners would want to be associated with anything that could be interpreted as possible collusion, illegality or unfair practice. This must all present as squeaky clean.
Far are treading on glass here, so they must have a strong case to adopt this course of action. IMO