WR1 General Discussion, page-13944

other way to consider it is; instead of a rectangular prism, maybe a rhombus; pushed over square; (AZS also provided some good imagery)

The 850 is the east west length atm;

the 250, is the horizontal depth atm, as consistency is not complete, however once it reaches the AZM border its 300m (Hypotenuse)

the width can be averaged by using the image below; 50 or 35.

When it comes to the ins and outs, thats where different software interprets it. LRS are using block modelling, other pieces of software use similar blocks, but also speculate intrusions of lith into surrounding rock (Sequent i think- f88ling confusing) Its the intrusion of the lith and variables inputted into to the system that allow different levels of confidence. I think measured is 25 x 25m spacings, indicated 50x 50, and 100x100 for inferred with a 90% chance that lit will be at X point. Also say, 5% lith at x for 10m, they may assume 5m away its 2% for 5m without drilling, then a further 5m away 1% for 5m, then an actually reading of 5m at 1%.

Sorry, if this seems at all condescending, i find it hard to explain. Bigger deposits are easier to gauge that little ones (LRS/GL1 are hard to predict as they are little intercepts but over big areas so the simple math above doesnt work aswell. PMET, on the other hand you can get 150mt using the above. Wr1 is also quite easy atm, along with the cancet deposit.

I have gone the rabbit hole with Jorc modelling and came out stupid and employed a Geo.







I have used wo