"writings on the wall" or are there positives!, page-9

What I personally think will happen is that we'll never hit a steady state of nameplate capacity. Instead the company will lower the targeted tonnage and lower overheads proportionally. Maybe to, say, 800 instead of 1200.

I think we could then see this smaller plant produce more around the 2-4million PA profit rather than the estimated 8.

In my opinion this will still allow a 'proof of procedure' to the business model, thus giving high chance of funding.

The main thing is to be in the black with a sustainable rate of production, not to hit an unrealistic nameplate capacity on a plant that simply isnt designed for the process.

Otherwise, the procedure itself may just be a dud, but the fact they have had good amounts produced for 24 or 48 hours straight tends to suggest its not.