The shareholders of tech businesses should be very proactive in...

The shareholders of tech businesses should be very proactive in asking about their "why" instead of accepting the nonsense they publish as strategy...

@mediaatt

Why do you say the published strategy is nonsense?

What do they need to publish for you to say... "oh, that makes sense"?

Can you elaborate on the complexities that "Payday" superannuation poses for a tech stack builder/engineer?

My questions to you a few posts back about Wrkr Pay 2.0 may have some more relevance now, (or not) now that Payday superannuation is in the market place?

Will Wrkr's tech stack reach the Worker and empower that Worker to take more control of their future work place related experiences and more importantly, positive "compliant" outcomes?

A simple "real time" notification on a device could be all it takes...

$3.4 billion in unpaid super is not a small number....

Is there any correlation between payday superannuation, open banking and/or open superannuation for the worker?

Does our recent partnership hold a piece to the value proposition puzzle you speak of?

Is Wrkr Pay 2.0 merely just a tech/rails change?






I don't ask all of these questions specifically to you @mediaatt. They may not be exactly the right questions, but any one may feel free to answer them if they wish.


Cheers,

Jocko.