xjo weekend zoomba lounge, page-85

well ive often thought the same thing about random filtering, and found it humorous on certain threads where TAs have argued over the placement of fibs etc when all of them can be considered to be valid to some degree, so long as consistency is maintained in the interpretation

this makes sense if you think of analysis as just phasing or interference between multiple waveforms.

hence, to some degree, the ability for some to see evidence of conspiracies where others see transparency, or why someone like john nash could find codes in random articles.

meaning can be applied after the fact. then it all comes down to continuity of pattern recognition.

interesting stuff.