They are only immune from legal challenges when “acting in the ‘public interest’, exercising their ‘public health responsibilities’…usually in cases where they have pulled a product and private companies have sued .
see the ‘pan pharma case’ around 2008-2010 where they took the TGA to court for pulling a product for public health reasons and the TGA were found liable for damages for doing this and had to stump up $65 MILLION…that’s why the government subsequently put that provision in.
They are only immune from legal challenges when “acting in the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 13 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
