There is some truth in what QF8 is saying (whether I like it is...

There is some truth in what QF8 is saying (whether I like it is another story)

With all the excellent research on articles provided by @scar76, I have often wondered why Xped or even ADRC is not explicitly mentioned. In 9 out of 10 articles, we are left to make inferences or join dots.

On another point, someone alluded to Xped folding and technology being taken etc. It is an interesting observation.

It does remind me of the scenario with CFU. The tech was fantastic (conversion of gas to electricity plus hot water as a by -product!), but the company struggled to commercialise (manufacturing in Germany). Ultimately the company went into voluntary admin. Shareholders received zilch for such wonderful tech that received multiple awards. Go figure.
The tech however (apparently) lives on!

I hope that does not happen here.

Interesting how our advisors are being paid with shares, yet Directors pay, if cut by 50% could make a significant contribution towards those advisor fees.

And then to the value of that advice. Something we will never know (as we are not privy to it, but I am curious as to how many hours and what advice has been provided to acrue over $1m in 6 months.

Having high director/management fees and high advisor costs doesn't sit well with me. One should drop for the other and vice versa.