It took you 6 posts to say something I already told you about 2 days ago.
It confirms my belief that when you rush in to defend your posts and the stock, you don't actually read the details. This is further highlighted by posting 2-3 replies to 1 poster. Post first then think second. Then post again.
And you are now asking the question I posed of you 2 days ago. I asked what does the "partnership" with MSFT mean for XPE other than as Vendor and cCustomer. In particular, XPE have paid for a subscription to use Azure. In time, XPE may flog their solution on the Azure Marketplace.
And your last question: "how Xped will get paid as MAzure receives subscriptions globally"
Have you read those Azure Case Studies I sent? Have you found one instant where MSFT sells a "partner's" solution on behalf of the "partner"? I did not.
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-gb/case-studies/
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-gb/case-studies/?service=event-hubs
I think you have the relationship around the wrong way. MSFT, imo, will not be selling XPE directly of XPE nor collecting money on behalf nor promoting it other than in the Marketplace where prospective buyers have the option to purchase directly from the Vendor. In the Azure marketplace, the vendor is the solutions provider, such as XPE, selling an Azure based offering.
MSFT offer an open license where it says: "Resell Azure services through open licensing". And: "Azure in Open Licensing provides a great way to grow your cloud business with a familiar licensing option that enables you to easily add cloud services along with your other on-premises solutions. Cloud opportunities are exploding, with 35% of Azure business coming from partners like you."
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-gb/offers/ms-azr-0111p/
I look forward to your response. But can can I respectfully ask you only to:
1. Respond once after careful consideration of the information I have provided here and in my previous responses to you?
2. Provide hard evidence such as an MSFT case study to support your position rather than offering an opinion/"The Truth" or more dots. I stand ready to be corrected. MSFT may well decide to flog the XPE solution. My doubts are this goes against the MSFT business model and I haven't seen a case study supporting MSFT going against their usual business model. If they have done so, then there would be a case study and/or the offering itself. I cannot see it.
Thanks in advance.
Side note: I accessed my broker "partner" to see the SP has continued to slide without an announcement confirming first revenues as per XPE guidance.
But its good. Its for our investment.
(20min delay)