OAK 0.00% 6.9¢ oakridge international limited

Xped - Further action, page-85

  1. 1,031 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1
    This is the letter I wrote to Chris Wood on November 15 last year.
    I don't think there was anything underhand about it.
    I received two short phone calls from Chris at the request of Athan in which he basically told me salaries were higher for the US (where he was then based) than in Adelaide. I recall telling him that the main salary concern from holders was Athan's salary.
    Chris was concerned about the remuneration report not being passed and Marty not getting a bonus. I said shareholders were not prepared to sit back and pointed out that the Commonwealth Bank had just received a first strike. He wasn't aware of that.
    Both phone calls were very short. I did ask him about the circumstances of Lisa leaving and he said he was the one who made the decision.
    He then followed up with the short letter urging people to reconsider their votes. I'd communicated with most via Messenger and knew there was a very strong view that various resolutions should not be passed.
    Secret backroom deals! Hah!


    Dear Chris
    ,
    I am an Xped shareholder who will be a proxy at the AGM for at least
    27 shareholders from the Xped Investor Chatroom on Facebook. Many of
    those have already voted online with the ability to change their votes
    until Monday November 28. Collectively they own many millions of
    shares.

    Like others who have invested in the company I think the technology is
    exciting and the future hopefully is bright for us as well as the
    company, manufacturers, industry and consumers.

    However the share price is in the doldrums and shareholders have a lot
    of fear about their investment while the AGM resolutions include
    lavish bonuses and share dilution. I believe just about all
    shareholders will be voting yes to the first three resolutions but no
    to some or all of the others and this is why I am asking you to ask
    the board to have a rethink.

    Regarding bonuses offered to management many believe they are too
    generous and the bar is set way too low, incorporating income from
    stand-alone companies taken over. I know others have written to you
    about this.

    Shareholders these days are not prepared to sit back and see money
    siphoned off and a wise board drops excessive bonus proposals and also
    share dilution proposals.

    Many shareholders are also nervous about the fate of the company under
    the management of Athan Lekkas, although you have said he is a core to
    the current and future success of Xped and detailed his achievements.


    I can see you have praised him highly, noting that he convinced Martin
    Despain to leave a secure highly paid job and secured a collaboration
    agreement with Telink, attracting Dr Wenjun Sheng. But I wonder if the
    role of the founders in this has been minimised. I had always thought
    that you and John Schultz had discussions with Telink in which both
    sides saw an exciting resonance in their technology ideas and mission.
    That scenario would make far more sense to me than Mr Lekkas being the
    architect of the whole collaboration as he’s not from an IoT
    background. Dealmaker - yes, boffin who knows about widgets – no.

    I think the board needs to clarify where Mr Lekkas is working and
    where he will be in future. You said in the reply published on Hot
    Copper that “Athan is not receiving USA based living costs,
    accommodation, vehicle and living expenses”, but this package was
    listed in the annual report. The explanatory AGM memorandum clarifies
    that it’s “to the extent Mr Lekkas is required to relocate to the USA
    at any time” but this information would have been overlooked by many
    holders and the market.


    As a side issue there is shareholder concern about prior business
    decision of Mr Lekkas and I’m not referring to horrible things said on
    Hot Copper. It is fact that Soaring Securities was deregistered, Raya
    didn’t do well in geothermal and First Growth Funds has had a big
    drop in value while directors receive large benefits and propose to
    dish out millions more shares and options. Really it’s not confidence
    inspiring although your response published on Hot Copper has gone some
    way towards boosting confidence.

    To me personally Telink and the JVs make a lot of sense because they
    would allow for a Chinese led headstart for ADRC while mainstream
    manufacturers maybe sit and wait to see which way the wind blows with
    Homekit etc. ADRC products in the market could inspire the mainstream
    to follow, and also give the Deb browser app a purpose. I think JCT
    and Vital Xense also have roles in competitive markets.

    But shareholders need to know more.
    We need to know the status of the MOUs. Can we rule out Intel and
    Microsoft on the grounds that their names have been mentioned and the
    MOUs required secrecy?
    We haven’t had an update on MOUs for some time and shareholders wonder
    how this ties in with ASX Guidance Note 8 on Continuous Disclosure
    We also haven’t had an update on Tytronics, Wire By Click and Leapin.

    I think we need a clear, concise timeline update by the AGM and
    indications of revenue from Telink chips and other sources. It’s hard
    for me to see anything coming from Intel. It seems that the Intel
    solutions site merely hosts solutions and doesn’t actively promote
    them. The investor roadshow presentation I found was very hard to read
    on my laptop and even harder on the phone. It was information dense
    and difficult to follow so I hope the next one is in easy read format.


    Shareholders would also like to know how many people Xped employs, not
    including the self-contained businesses of JCT and Codium, because we
    know that various staff have left under somewhat mysterious
    circumstances and the company seems top heavy with a highly paid CEO
    and a highly paid MD both wanting loan shares and bonuses.
    Shareholders want to know if a small company needs a CEO and an MD.

    Some other questions – why wasn’t a trading halt called when the share
    price started to plunge in August? What steps has the company taken to
    stop manipulation of the share price? And why has there been a
    revolving door of financial advisors each wanting a large chunk of
    shares and options?

    I do hope some of these issues can be clarified and that the share
    price does not drop further when the market opens tomorrow after a
    capital raise that many see as unwarranted at this time.
    I hope you can pass on my concerns to the board because they reflect
    concerns generally.

    Best regards,
    Last edited by prospects: 22/12/17
  2. This thread is closed.

    You may not reply to this discussion at this time.

 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add OAK (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
Last
6.9¢
Change
0.000(0.00%)
Mkt cap ! $1.862M
Open High Low Value Volume
0.0¢ 0.0¢ 0.0¢ $0 0

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
1 88627 6.2¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
7.0¢ 20890 1
View Market Depth
Last trade - 16.12pm 09/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ?
OAK (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.