That may or may not be the case, Scott. But that's not what you...

That may or may not be the case, Scott. But that's not what you said. You said:

"the evidence from this important research shows that there is less child abuse and neglect in Aboriginal families than in non-Aboriginal families"

......which is completely at odds with the link you provided. Not only is it at odds with it, it is a wildly inaccurate statement to make given the 48-v-7.2 ratio. If you don't think I'm right, then do please post ACTUAL figures from the report (including page no) that I can compare with the published number of 48:7 so I have all the facts, and not just the ones that don't correlate to your assertions. Otherwise I think you owe Mr Dutton and Ms Price a sincere apology, because the figures in the link you provided seem to fully justify their position and you were fairly vile with your treatment of them.