"Zelensky never knew about any 'deal', the aid was delivered on time, there was no investigation, the released record doesn't have any 'deal'. It's a quid faux quo. "
Neal 1 - his opinion.
"Zelensky never knew about any 'deal', the aid was delivered on time, there was no investigation, the released record doesn't have any 'deal'. It's a quid faux quo. "
Neal 2 - Ciaramella's error-strewn whinge about a conversation he was not party to is ultimately irrelevant. There was either a deal or there wasn't.
"Zelensky never knew about any 'deal', the aid was delivered on time, there was no investigation, the released record doesn't have any 'deal'. It's a quid faux quo. "
Neal 3 - Another opinion, as per 1
"Zelensky never knew about any 'deal', the aid was delivered on time, there was no investigation, the released record doesn't have any 'deal'. It's a quid faux quo. "
Neal 4 - Any 1st hand knowledge witnesses can come forward once an official vote is held on articles of impeachment, or if the legal system ultimately grants the current sham subpoena powers.
"Zelensky never knew about any 'deal', the aid was delivered on time, there was no investigation, the released record doesn't have any 'deal'. It's a quid faux quo. "
