Fazz, they had to relinquish part of original licence area, 50% I think, because the original agreement terms would have stipulated that. They didn't have to give it up as a trade-off of getting an extended first term, which would have ended in Jan '09 (3 yrs). They requested an extension beyond this date to attract a top-shelf farmin partner to take them forward into the drilling stage (next 2yr term) and I believe they got the original extension because they had greatly exceeded the minimum work requirement for the first term. I think the second term would also require a further acreage relinquishment (poss. 25% of remaining acreage) as is normal for these kinds of contracts. Requesting a further extension of term 1 might mean some concession will need to be offered by FAR but, then again, FAR might by now be on V good terms with the top brass in Senegal. Or they might be complete lepers, but I don't know why FAR would even try for an extensiuon if they didn't think they had a good chance. Seems unlikely that it's a bit of theatre simply to appease disgruntled shareholders.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- FAR
- you be the judge
you be the judge, page-39
Featured News
Add FAR (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
52.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $48.05M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
52.0¢ | 53.5¢ | 52.0¢ | $17.03K | 32.56K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 10069 | 52.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
54.0¢ | 22471 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 10069 | 0.520 |
3 | 110000 | 0.515 |
2 | 35000 | 0.510 |
2 | 45521 | 0.505 |
1 | 29878 | 0.500 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.540 | 22471 | 1 |
0.550 | 82295 | 3 |
0.600 | 25953 | 2 |
0.610 | 2000 | 1 |
0.000 | 0 | 0 |
Last trade - 15.03pm 05/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
FAR (ASX) Chart |