Ask yourself this, if VMY truly has no financial path to success this decade, why would "The Australia Institute" feel the need to produce such as scathing report? Surely they wouldn't worry about the whole matter, because market forces will simply kill VMY off without them lifting a finger. If its economically unviable, it will never be built. They dont need to do anything right, VMY is clearly dead in the water, so then why did they create the report? To protect the interests of the poor humble retail investor getting conned by the big bad U hoax? I mean what possible other reason could an anti-nuclear, left-leaning, renewables lobbying "think tank" have?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- VMY
- You have a better chance of hitting a hole in one
You have a better chance of hitting a hole in one, page-46
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 29 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add VMY (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online