Tekvest raises valid concerns about ZIP’s financial position and decision-making. The example of the $90 million loan, which carried penalties exceeding double the borrowed amount, demonstrates the precarious nature of its financing arrangements. The subsequent $267 million capital raise to repay that loan not only reflects poor financial management but also highlights the ongoing erosion of flexibility in the company’s ability to raise funds. The fact that shareholder approval is now required for further capital raises is a significant limitation that signals deeper structural problems within the business.
ZIP’s reluctance to address its capital structure raises serious questions. If the company is unwilling to make changes because of a potential takeover, this strategy risks delaying action during a critical time in the US market. By waiting too long, they may miss opportunities to reposition themselves competitively before macroeconomic conditions worsen. On the other hand, if the hesitation stems from a refusal to seek shareholder approval, the repercussions after 1 July could be devastating. Both scenarios highlight substantial risks and reinforce concerns about the company’s ability to navigate its current challenges.
On another note, I’d like to ask @FreeFromStyle if there’s any truth to the claim that you attempted to have Tekvest’s comment about ZIP’s inability to borrow or raise capital moderated on the grounds of “misinformation”. If so, what specifically was incorrect about the statement? Open and transparent discussion is crucial, and we should prioritise facts over attempts to silence differing viewpoints.
ZIP Price at posting:
$3.04 Sentiment: Sell Disclosure: Not Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)