There is a plethora of projects completed and under way from previous government policy.
These have already installed batteries, covered the landscape with thousands of hectares of changed landuse - solar arrays and Wind farms.
What is done is done and has increased the cost of energy considerably.
Setting unrealistic targets has also been undertaken.
Additionally, millions of people have replaced equipment previously powered by fuels, added personal wind generators, solar arrays and water turbines where and when it became rational to do so, and use new equipment powered by renewable energy storage.
I pose the question ....
Who says, how much, by when, by whom, best / worst case,
integrated on what basis and why is one idea more "right" than another.
Are contingency plans allowed?
Why does there not seem to be an integrated approach to resource demand / supply so that the transformation doesnt send everyone broke rushing toward utopia.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Accelerate the World's Transition to Sustainable Energy - to fight Anthropogenic Climate Change
Accelerate the World's Transition to Sustainable Energy - to fight Anthropogenic Climate Change, page-20565
- There are more pages in this discussion • 13,626 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online