Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

You say "can you please back up that claim with proof? please...

First 135 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Orbiter

1,528 Posts.

15/01/15

20:57

Post #: 14591300
Share

Originally posted by taughtbuffet ↑

DBT9,

you say,

So, now, toughbuffet, tell me this: why do you believe that the 'work' of unqualified individual's with vested interests such as Henry M. Morris are to be considered a reliable source, but the established, peer reviewed work of scientists working within their field of expertise (biology, evolution) are not to be taken seriously?

I say,

it's Taught, not Tough,

and I NEVER said "the established, peer reviewed work of scientists .....are not to be taken seriously"

SO STOP MISSQUOTING ME,

I said,

if you believe that Trademanic supplies dodgy material,

can you please back up that claim with proof?

please point to his posts which you believe to be dodgy and post your counter-arguement to validate your claim.

otherwise you are just like the rest

IN OTHER WORDS, have a civil debate, point, counter point,

is that too hard to understand??????????????????

saying Trademanic supplies dodgy material does not make any point you are trying to raise more valid, if anything else it makes them less

Expand

You say

"can you please back up that claim with proof?

please point to his posts which you believe to be dodgy and post your counter-arguement to validate your claim."

I say

DBT9 clearly has pointed to posts and provided counter arguments. Continually asking him to repeat himself does not mean has not addressed your concerns already.

Man...sigh...
3 Upvote

Reply