read below, page-18

re: read below -spovend GZ You state the possibility of the situation being a "cut & dry process where strict compliance to the Act", however the very nature of Section 111A which gives the Minister discretion under 'public interest' makes this a subjective situation which cannot be cut & dry, the Minister has to interfere if a 111A is submitted therefore we need to focus on the only avenue he has available to give it back to RIO which is the public interest argument - with RIO having not done jack and CAZ ready to go with a drill program, funding and a BUYER then the Minister cannot argue that the public interest is with RIO and all being fair the decision has to go to CAZ....the biergerg situation made it very easy for the Minister to make the decision as he can fall back on the public interest argument but this is not the case here hence why I feel CAZ will be awardred the lease!!