Our Peers., page-20

  1. 1,615 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 8
    What i find interesting is everybody compares KNL's peers to current MC but yet when KNL was a much less fundamentally strong stock in 2014 the share price was trading as high as 60c. Current MC for KNL is irrelevant given how undervalued KNL is and also gives reason as to why peers with potentially explosive fundamentals with what people think of high fundamentals or half that of KNL's current MC,have massive upside in their share prices too.
    To put it into perspective KNL trading at 60c (2014)had a MC of 120m+ based on current SOI.
    BKT currently trading at 8c with a MC of a mere $17million therefore could still easily be a 5 bagger,but the fact is BKT is in the same period as KNL's spike in 2014 if not more advanced and BKT actually has less shares on issue too which is a positive with 2.5million in cash and no debt Ulanzi is progressing to be a much better & bigger resource than Epanko without sounding like i am comparing the 2.
    Last edited by johnno261: 23/10/15
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.