prawn_man - thanks for pointing that out, and your comments about the IP chargeability at CB3 and CB4 are correct, although the mag and gravity are high the IP chargeability was low so presumably they hit dense magnetic rocks at targets CB3 and 4 but no copper mineralization. That's important to note.
So if we make the leap to the provisional working model being that SCI might have a hematite/magnetite destructive event related to the cross faults that might be controlling the copper mineralization, and as you imply, CI can look at the magnetics to find the right stratigraphy and then either use IP, soil geochemistry or field mapping to find the cross faults and test those targets might be the next exploration approach? Of course got to be careful not to become too fixated on exploration models too early, as its possible to fall into the trap of ignoring evidence of further mineralization that doesn't fit your model.
Its very early days yet but if indeed there is a possibility of a Selwyn style series of ironstone hosted sub-vertical orebodies under their noses at supposedly one of the most studied and mature exploration spaces in Australia (i.e. within visual sight of the Broken Hill line of lode) then that would be a huge discovery.
SCI Price at posting:
3.5¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
(20min delay)