Has a licensing deal been struck for VIRALEZE™ nasal spray, page-28

I have been analysing the possible scenarios further and have the following input:

First the events:

1. The viraleze.co web site is essentially off the air and is redirecting to Starphrama.com.
2. Viraleze has disappeared from the Lloyds on line site. Not just "out of stock" but "Not found".
3. John Bell & Croydon site is still apparently selling Viraleze.
4. There are no "health warnings" about Viraleze anywhere.

So why would the two selling channels for Viraleze stop without notice? And why would Viraleze disappear from Lloyds?

We know that McKesson owns Lloyds and is a major player with revenues of USD $231B. It would presumably have done the deal with Starpharma.

Could McKesson and Starpharma have had a fall out. Could there have been an injunction served? This would explain both events 1 and 2 above.

I thought about the big new deal and a rebranding and the more I thought about it the more it did not fit with a total withdrawal of Viraleze from Lloyds. I deduce that John Bell & Croyden has a degree of independence and while it is part of the McKesson relationship it is not under total McKesson control.

So I think there is either a spat which Jackie has not been able to resolve or McKesson has made a bid for the whole Viraleze business and will rebrand.

We live in interesting times.