Ann: VIRALEZE ADMENTA agreement - supplementary information, page-45

From The Age this evening

www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/police-called-to-medical-clinic-as-scores-allegedly-seek-vaccine-exemptions-20211013-p58zph.html

“A spokesman for the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency and the Medical Board of Australia said while they were limited in being able to disclose whether they were investigating a particular individual, their message was clear: that vaccination is a crucial part of the public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
“Public protection is our number one priority. When providing care, advice or sharing information online, registered health practitioners have a professional obligation to provide information that is evidence-based, in line with the best available health advice, and is consistent with public health messaging,” he said.

“Advising against vaccination unless there are evidence-based medical reasons undermines the national immunisation campaign and is not supported by the board.”
The spokesman urged any practitioner being asked to supply exemption certificates to know and understand the advice provided by the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI).
He said the consequences of providing an exemption when it was not warranted could be significant, including being barred from providing exemptions or managing patients in relation to COVID-19 matters. They could also have their registrations suspended.”

IMO, the MBA don’t want exemptions, and as an extension to that they don’t want Viraleze…or SaNOtize, or anything else outside their blinkered approach.
I am not saying it is wrong, because vaccination undoubtedly saves lives, but there is no motivation for the TGA to bust a gut approving Viraleze.
SPL are in limbo.