General comments/chat, page-28777

Hey guys

I notice fixation on the word “lie” in my post. Naturally there are negative connotations associated with the word and so it comes across as accusatory and obviously there’s fixation by those invested to defend the company, and I would too should I feel different. Would a synonym have suited better? Would phrasing it differently soften the blow? I think we are splitting hairs here. Take the word out of the post and it would read differently to you? The word is not the problem.

@Wombat2, there was no mention of JM in my post nor are we in the building and commissioning phase and that is exactly the problem. I have made my comments re operational timeline delays and think they are justified. Avoiding wishful thinking and not being ignorant is exactly why I factored these operational changes in to my decision to sell and followed through on my actions. I’m not just “hoping” they fix these things I want proof, and I will re-enter.

For every PLS example of missing constant deadlines and making it to $6B MC there is 10 examples of missing constant deadlines and having the company flop on or flop over forever and your experience in the markets should tell you that.

FWIW I was asked to comment and gave my rationale. It’s human nature of defend against any opposing view when you are heavily invested but people are fixated on a word on a post not the actions of the company, or they are genuinely happy with the timelines and so on and can afford to wait / it’s within their strategy - more power to you all. The end goal in investing is making money and I try not to lose sight of that or fall in love with the stock which I have here in the past admittedly.

This is my opinion only and I am sticking to it. I do not post online to please everyone but I try to give a balanced opinion where I can.