Beware of the weasel words of potentially be of significant benefit for people over 45? How weak were the stats that even in a age subset it is still a wishy washy statement IMO
It doesn't even say they spray :will should or would - it say "Could" have clinical benefit in over 45 group?
I hope they can do something with data that is positive so it wasn't just $ pissed against the wall but I'll wait and see as their lack of communication is my biggest red flag and so crazy as I don't believe commenting would disadvantage SPL. It would advantage SPL and markets full understanding of trial results .
SPL Price at posting:
9.7¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
