five myths about kos quashed, page-14

SP3,

I'm not saying Kos's job is easy, however the main reason I bought in and I imagine yourself is for the technology.
Does Kos have the necessary negotiating skills to get a deal done and to keep a client happy in dealing with us?
What do we have at the moment... potential, nothing concrete that will see us producing bce by a set date.
Has Kos (esi) been able to stick to timelines? It is important to underpromise and over deliver, has that ever happened? As an investor or potential investor what do you look for if you are approached. Management need to convey a clear path to profitability and need to stick to timelines. Too much was placed on the tincom deal, did it really take this long to realise that there continual delaying would end up where we are now. Does come down to Kos? Why haven't the polish or indonesian mou's progressed? Why have we spent so much money as IMOTT has stated at this early stage when our main focus needs to be on progressing the first deal... not trying to engage a hundred companies to all come on board at the same time.
How long do we have left before the money runs out? What stage will we be at then?
I took a big gamble with esi around 6 years ago, sold out a while after the tincom announcement and bought back in on announcing access to coal. With the continual delays I slowly sold out again and sold my last parcel in the last week. Till we get a more definite direction in which we are heading, while La Jolla continually dump and with current market conditions I think it is better to sit on the sidelines and wait.
I don't think Kos is going anywhere, so we will see where we end up, for yourself and a few very dedicated posters(not rampers, and people who manage to sell out just in time for the tincom announcement and still spruik esi like no tomorrow) and a good friend of mine I hope Kos can turn this around.