Ann: SPL receives positive FDA feedback on DEP SN38 for PROC, page-38

You have an opinion. You don't have to read my posts.
Go look at previous posts that were actually referenced to trial design and look at trials that were done by others . I called out the viraleze post market trial design forced upon SPL pretty early and wondered if it could be suitably powered and even when it failed gave you the detail required to fill in a couple of assumptions as I didn't believe it was as you inferred non compliance etc. Year I know stuff all and you keep up with your assumption of my role in the warehouse cleaner or whatever slight you last tried to bait with.
If you seriously believe there is not enough evidence posted regarding our local "conspiracy theorist" you must be reading a different forum.

It is good to know that you encourage unsubstantiated lies about my posts, false information and abuse by other posters and not expect me to post correcting information. What nit interested in calling out that behavior and just want to take a pot shot?

So @bid am sure in this announcement you have considered the SPL numbers and glad you believe understand them and are not taken in by the IMO bait of addressable audience unlike others who in past have done incorrect straight line analysis and come up with crazy numbers. Silly me for pointing it out to the gullible