That was from me, but the quote is being taken out of its...

That was from me, but the quote is being taken out of its context (again).

The original comment made by someone else was that the $42M was well spent *because it guaranteed us $4m per year in income*.

I was merely pointing out that of itself that is not a good enough reason to commit $42M when you could in theory simply draw down $4M from a cash pile each year, and be earning interest on the rest as well (and available to fund BNPL or other activities). Yes it would *obviously* deplete the pile, but it’s also not committing all funds up front.

Please do try to quote things in context of possible (although I know they tend to get lost in these threads).