mannvenn, I read that fool post, too. The main message is worthy...

mannvenn, I read that fool post, too. The main message is worthy enough (did TIX pay too much?), but the remainder reveals sub-high school research, which questions the writer's depth on the main message as well. Specifically:
1. "could be a protracted takeover" and "the deal has every chance of falling over"??? Fool published this one day AFTER ANI's board recommended the takeover.
2. "360 Capital holds approx 33%". TIX reported LAST WEEK that it held more than 36%, and at 10am on the date of the fool's post (13 Oct) TIX announced that it held more than 74%. In short, fool relied on week-old announcements when writing this post! If the post was published an hour or two before the critical new information at 10am, then fool failed to edit/update readers with this critical new information.
3. Fool posted this recommendation AFTER ANI holder rights to TIX quarterly dividend had expired. The post doesn't mention this, yet refers to ANI's estimated FY16 distributions!