Hey DV, high risk/high reward is a fair summary of investing in ‘penny dreadfuls’, with that will come, naturally, with emotional feelings of highs and lows, the latter with resulting recriminations when it all turns to shite, that’s human nature.
suziki has made some good points, that I have acknowledged, though it could come across as a little ‘rich’, his comment ‘Why do investors run this stock down’?, his viewpoint comes from the luxury of entering at a ‘attractive’ buy in, he was astute enough to buy/sell and then drop like a ‘hot potato’ because he recognised the immediate realities faced by Admedus, as per ralom.
He has repeatedly said this is a ‘punt’ and quite correct, imo, in saying ‘his’ losses will be minimal.
You have ‘hounded’ me in regard to being a trader yet not a ‘whisper’ against Mr s!!, no disrespect meant suziki.
Do you know how many times a wry comes to my dial when I read your comments in regard to the BOD at ADO? ..... many, your belief in truth, justice, contrary viewpoints, free speech etc there is sadly ‘dismissed’ by your good self here at Ahz!, yes I agree there are some extreme viewpoints here, both in the pro AND con camps!
This current BOD does have a lot to answer too, it is not one year past previous BOD but 3 years!, spiel of being ‘bankable’, stake my rep on, never missed a forecast etc etc yet how many CRs and suspensions later?? ..... and you not expect RI to not be demanding!, regardless of the fact that ‘yes’ this is not a blue chip. and is high risk/ high reward.
Though you you claim to be unemotional, balanced etc etc you are not, I won’t bother this forum with the many examples that show you are not.
Please give me a few examples where you have upvoted contrary viewpoints!, I have only seen one from yourself, for myself, haven’t checked last fifty or so though, so either my posts either shite OR not within your ability to counter.
Would you acknowledge that WP does have credibility issues? .... and his good self 100% to blame, (over promised and under delivered despite his considerable background)
That the ‘legacy’ issue is, (actions of previous BOD) at this point in time, is now a meaningless ‘cop out’.
That the departure of Ratty and Minderoo was a hugely damning indictment against current BOD! ..... that anyone raising concerns or red flagging is then ‘running’ this stock down FOR expressing these concerns!
I would sincerely suggest that your ‘... analytical and logical failures involved with those claims are too scary to spell out’ 100% applies to your good self on this particular forum!
My particularly viewpoints are not necessarily correct, they lay in neither camp, I say NO to BOD spill, No to Resolutions 9 and 11, I acknowledge WP has a tough gig though he does have a heck of a lot to answer for, has been, arguably, ‘misleading’ to RI etc etc.
Unless you have some ‘meaningful’ dialogue to counter with save your ‘valuable’ time in replying in the interim!
Really hard to understand whether you are ‘testing the mettle’ of realists or simply oblivious to the realities faced by Admedus, the angst felt by RI and the results of the actions of this good BOD have led Admedus too.
Expand
(20min delay)