Ann: Binding Sales and Distribution Agreement with IberoClays SLU, page-108

First 108 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
GMoney79

665 Posts.

1191

23/01/24

14:58

Post #: 72023854
Share

Originally posted by TheEndTimes ↑

that’s what I said and grmoney tried to get me on a technicality because he couldn’t handle facts and is dishonest af.
thanks for being partly honest and saying those things were actually said.
i say partly, because that WAS the focus at that point.he spoke far more about the blue sky stuff than any traditional kaolin markets.demonstrated by the merger that u all got shafted on (sold to u because of the nanotech) because of the amount of funding to universities, CC plants etc etc.
it’s why people now call bs on that stuff and how refreshing it is Bob talks about more realistic stuff.
I’ll stop talking about the past as long as people stop talking about it still being an opportunity and/or making stupid challenges as if those things were never said.

Expand

To be clear I am not getting you on a technicality - your quote is below (again)

say were mining 2 years ago for $10M per tonne and SH’s say “we’re going to the
moon

I’ll repeat, nowhere ever has the company said they’d be mining from 2 years ago and selling product for $10m a tonne from that moment. You have said they did say that, I challenged you to prove that statement, and you still can not. They did say it’s a future possibility, but they did not say from the moment they commence mining they’d be selling product for $10m a tonne.

You are clearly not going to acknowledge what was agreed to and your inability to substantiate your claims. It just proves what majority here know, you are only here to spread FUD and you can’t hold your own word/agreements…..

You can’t argue your statement is half right either, you agreed to validate the whole claim, and you know you can’t.

ADN Price at posting: 2.3¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
9 Upvote

4 Great analysis

Reply