Ann: Copper Sulphides Intersected at Mt Hope & Lady Fanny South, page-23

1% copper is considered average for small-medium scale open pit in non-porphyry deposits.

Can you please elaborate on the "good grade, shallow and nice widths"?
They drilled through the guts of the main anomaly at Mt Hope North and based on the visuals looks like they'll get ~12m @ 2-3% cu, reasonable but from 189m depth, and no where near the initial discovery hole at ND, and not quite Booming imo.

4 other holes drilled at Mt Hope - 2 average results from shallow depths, 1 into an IP anomaly with only trace sulphides, 1 with negligible cu based on visuals.

The deep diamond hole drilled into the "Lights Up" anomaly at LF South has only hit long lengths of halo style mineralisation, which based on visuals in the table will have mostly low grade <1 % cu.

Instead of making baseless and false accusations about myself and Undaunted, perhaps you can ask @GeoFiji his thoughts on the "early cash flow" he mentioned from Mt Hope before any hole was drilled let alone any resources defined or feasibility studies?