The table has two columns of assays which are both estimates of...

The table has two columns of assays which are both estimates of the grade of the stuff fed into the flotation test. The first column is a composite assay of the whole drillhole interval. The second column is the weighted-average grades of the six rougher float cell and tailings products. The column "Times Improvement" has nothing to do with the two sets of head grades.

The text above the table says "2-3 times" but not one of the elements assayed was upgraded "3 times" by the float test.

The data you need are in the results table below...



So no product grade / head grade greater than 2, only half of the Pr reports to con, some of the grades are so low as to be below detection and the product grades are lower than drill hole grades being reported by other clay-REE hopefuls and hard rock REE developers.




How much clay is there at the depths indicated in the table above? Bugger all I suspect! The grades should be compared to hard rock REE explorers and developers. The feed to the test was ground to a P80 of 53 microns - clay?????